Dan Trachtenberg
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b748/7b7484aec902149008abef0e7f9d4923555f8148" alt=""
The inner urge for survival is the most primitive of all impulses. For the longest time, sex was believed to be the driving force that pushes people, unconsciously and fully-cognizant, towards certain results in life. But after WWII especially, psychologists and holocaust survivors began to revisit the idea, and psychoanalysts took the obvious cue from Darwin:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14774/14774a61db2dc78de3b664261d5a684d2fec0fd5" alt="10 Cloverfield Lane"
A quick internet search confirmed that I’m not the only one sitting around wondering if 10 Cloverfield Lane is a true sequel to Cloverfield. I would personally lean towards a “no” answer, as the film began life as a standalone script and it shares no writing or directing credits with the original film. What seems to have caused all the confusion is the odd machinations of film financing, wherein a small label owned by Paramount Pictures folded and the project not yet called 10 Cloverfield Lane ended up with the company that made Cloverfield.